2018 ACS National Meeting
The 256th ACS National Meeting AGRO division will be held in Boston, Massachusetts this year. AGRO division platform presentations and posters will be at the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center. Below is our 2018 platform and poster line-up, along with respective abstracts. In most cases, we are also able to make presentations available for download after the conference, so stay tuned. If you have questions about any of these presentations, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The full 2018 ACS technical program can be found here>>
Four Waterborne experts are also co-chairing sessions this year. Catch these great sessions here:
- Amy Ritter, P.E.: “Reducing Uncertainty in Modeling the Environmental & Human Health Exposure to Agrochemicals,” on Monday, August 20, from 9:00 am – 12:00 pm in Ballroom East – Theater 4; and “Atmospheric Fate & Transport of Volatilized Agricultural Emissions,” on Wednesday, August 22, from 8:30 am – 5:00 pm in Ballroom East – Theater 5
- Dan Perkins, Ph.D. and Les Carver, P.G.: AGRO-SETAC Joint Symposium, “Role of Monitoring Data in Advancing Regulatory Risk Assessment,” on Wednesday, August 22, from 8:05 – 11:30 am in Ballroom East – Theater 4
- W. Martin Williams, P.E.: “Vector-Borne Diseases: Role of Chemistry in Managing Risks to Humans, Domestic Animals, Aquaculture & Wildlife,” on Monday, August 20, from 1:00 pm – 4:50 pm in Ballroom East – Theater 4 and Tuesday, August 21, from 8:05 am – 11:30 am in Ballroom East – Theater 3
We hope to see you in Boston!
Waterborne's Presentations & Posters
Leveraging national compensatory mitigation conservation offset strategies to proactively address endangered species section 7 authorized take of residual, unavoidable impacts permitted within national scale pesticide biological opinions
The release of the three organophosphate (and pending carbamate) national scale endangered species assessments have presented new challenges to the USEPA, NMFS, and USFWS. The biological evaluations (BEs) have identified many species and/or critical habitats as “may affect, likely to adversely affect” (LAA) which lead to extensive and costly Biological Opinions (BiOPs). The NMFS opinions indicated jeopardy and adverse modification and therefore the production of Recommended Prudent Alternatives (RPAs) which were designed to broadly reduce pesticide loadings with either significant use restrictions or significant drift and runoff controls. The extensive and complex burden on growers will result in significant impact on use of these important crop protection products, with unclear benefit to the specific listed species. Industry and the evaluating agencies are entrusted to both protect species populations while also support sound scientific decisions regarding federal actions related to crop protection chemical use in US agriculture. In some cases, localized use restrictions and buffers may offer adequate protections for a specific species population. In other cases, conservation offsets, of a similar spatial and temporal nature to the authorized take may provide for the agricultural use of crop protection products while improving the viability of the listed species. This talk will focus on the transfer of extensive experience in leveraging national compensatory mitigation strategies (Clean Water Act Section 404, Endangered Species Act Section 7) to mitigate the potential effect of an action and therefore providing both the ability to proceed with the action, providing an offset to address the authorized take provided to the applicant and associated parties, and working toward the species protection and recovery goal. The national application footprint of crop protection products offer risk assessment challenges, but solutions may be found and offramps to avoid expensive and potentially ineffective risk assessment refinements if all parties involved use creativity and tested approaches to holistically integrate the risk assessment findings and recovery plan options. The effect is to better leverage both the ESA and EPA authorization processes, resulting in improved endangered species viabilities (less listings, increased recoveries) and national scale pesticide risk assessments that are more practically linked to the landscape.
Wayne White (W-Squared Consulting), Jody Bickel, Nathan J. Snyder, Matt Kern (Waterborne Environmental). Leveraging national compensatory mitigation conservation offset strategies to proactively address endangered species section 7 authorized take of residual, unavoidable impacts permitted within national scale pesticide biological opinions. ACS 2018. Presentation. Boston, MA.
Refined land cover for improving the confidence of pesticide risk assessments
Today, field-scale crop location data are available at higher spatial resolution and classification accuracy than ever before. These data represent “best available scientific data” and can improve the confidence of human health and ecological risk assessments by providing more realistic, site-specific exposure estimates. For example, state-wide agricultural-focused land cover on an annual basis with 56 crop classes and a spatial resolution of ~2 meters is now available in California. Given that California ranks first in total crop receipts in the US and bounds nearly 20% of all federally listed species, increased spatial land use data resolution has the potential for measurable impact in risk assessment. Other novel opportunities exist for incorporating better data by cooperating with specialty crop grower groups who often have field surveys locating their member’s farms (e.g., Florida green beans). High-confidence data can be used to improve Percent Crop Area (PCA) adjustment factors required for estimating drinking water concentrations in human health risk assessments. From a FIFRA/ESA perspective, it is proving difficult to make determinations for many crop-species combinations with any degree of confidence using the spatial information presently available. Although inconvenient, there is arguably a need to incorporate better data as it becomes available.
To demonstrate the impact of the newly-available California land use data, a case study was conducted to contrast the effects of refined crop cover data on spatial proximity to non-target terrestrial species’ habitat. From an aquatic perspective, watershed scale (HUC-12) PCAs calculated using the EPA crop use sites, the 2014 CWS PCA guidance document approach, and the CA DWR land cover will be covered. These results can be used to gauge the impact that higher spatial resolution and classification accuracy can have on pesticide risk assessments relying on crop location information.
Daniel Perkins, Joshua Amos. Refined land cover for improving the confidence of pesticide risk assessments. ACS 2018. Presentation. Boston, MA.
Evaluation of applied, cross-sector vegetative best management practices in rights-of-way on pollinators
Transmission and pipeline rights-of-way (ROWs) in the U.S. are estimated to occupy approximately 21 million acres, roughly equivalent to the average harvested corn acres in Missouri and Illinois combined. Additionally, there are nearly 4 million miles of roadside ROW and 233 thousand miles of railroad ROW in the U.S. These ROWs dissect agricultural land, urban areas, and natural areas like forests and grasslands. Managed ROWs represent an opportunity to provide habitats for numerous species of plants and animals, including pollinators that provide critical ecosystem services for farms, natural areas, and private homeowners. Strategic creation of pollinator habitat in ROW with respect to cross-sector land management offers large potential benefits to agricultural production, conservation, education, and research. In this work, we hypothesize that the success of managed ROWs to provide quality pollinator habitat is based on a combination of integrated vegetation management (IVM) practices within ROWs, physical habitat characteristics, surrounding land use composition specific to geography/ecoregion characteristics, and pollinators of interest. We evaluate an experimental design aimed at identifying the effects of different IVM practices in ROWs on pollinators. We rely on variabilities in IVM practices and physical characteristics of ROWs reported in literature and other sources to statistically determine which design elements are important to discern potential effects on pollinator habitat quality. The findings will promote informed evaluation of conservation management strategies. Appropriate statistical and field study designs aimed to characterize pollinator success based on IVM practices would allow ROW managers to gain quantitative information to better understand where and when to establish IVMs across spatially explicit, complex and diverse landscapes. Additionally, agricultural land managers may benefit from implementation of certain IVM practices in ROWs that will positively impact crop production while promoting conservation of pollinators and other species.
Farah Abi-Akar, Daniel Perkins, Joshua Amos, Amelie Schmolke (Waterborne Environmental), Stan Vera-Art (Grow With Trees), Iris Caldwell (University of Chicago). Evaluation of applied, cross-sector vegetative best management practices in rights-of-way on pollinators. ACS 2018. Presentation. Boston, MA.
Modeling chemical partitioning at the water-sediment interface
The varying composition of bed sediments, combined with hydrodynamic and biological perturbations, have created challenges in modeling the partitioning of chemicals at the water-sediment interface in natural waters. A variety of approaches have been developed to predict chemical mass balance between the water column and benthic sediment. These approaches often involve some empirically-derived component to account for the many physical, chemical, biological, and temporarily varying processes that may affect chemical exchanges between water and sediment. This presentation looks at the different deterministic and empirical approaches, and commonly used assumptions, in several water quality models used in regulatory risk assessments and the establishments of TMDLs. Results of several approaches are compared for a variety of water depths, water chemistries, and hydraulic conditions.
W. Martin Williams, Amy M. Ritter. Modeling chemical partitioning at the water-sediment interface. ACS 2018. Presentation. Boston, MA.
Pesticides in Flooded Applications Model (PFAM) ecological modeling sensitivity and the impact of a receiving water body on ecological estimated environmental concentrations
The Pesticide in Flooded Application Model (PFAM) is used to estimate surface water concentrations primarily for pesticide applications to rice paddies. PFAM (version 2.0) has the potential to assess pesticide concentrations in rice paddy water and a receiving water body. However, the Environmental Fate and Effects Division in the EPA currently uses only the in-paddy concentration from the PFAM model for ecological risk assessments. A receiving waterbody such as a canal would be appropriate as a representative aquatic environment for ecological risk assessment of species (e.g. fish) not found in a typical US rice paddy. An assessment was performed using a hypothetical pesticide to conduct PFAM ecological sensitivity runs. The “ECO CA Winter No Turnover” and “ECO MS Winter No Turnover” scenarios were used in the modeling exercise. The simulations were performed with a single application per year on a standard 10-ha paddy. Pesticide concentrations in the paddy were compared with concentrations in two receiving waterbodies (canal and pond). The presentation will show the impact on the estimated environmental concentration (EEC) due to changes in the baseflow, surrounding watershed size and curve number, holding periods, and drift factors. Concentrations in the pond waterbody and canal were significantly lower than the in-paddy concentrations. This presentation highlights refinement options for appropriate aquatic environments that may receive outflow from a rice paddy.
Amy M. Ritter, W. Martin Williams. Pesticides in Flooded Applications Model (PFAM) ecological modeling sensitivity and the impact of a receiving water body on ecological estimated environmental concentrations. ACS 2018. Presentation. Boston, MA.
Crop ProtectionWater/Wastewater AssessmentPresentations
Atrazine Ecological Monitoring Program: Study design and conduct
Room: Ballroom East – Theater 4
Date: Monday August 22, 2018
Start Time: 8:35AM
Presentation Code: AGRO 228
A high sampling frequency watershed monitoring program, Atrazine Ecological Monitoring Program (AEMP), which began in 2004, has collected over 28,000 water samples representing 284 site years from 75 watersheds across 13 states in the Midwest and the South. The AEMP consists of compliance-based, targeted monitoring in small watershed (< 40 mi2) headwater streams, and is designed to identify environmental conditions in corn and sorghum agricultural watersheds that are susceptible to high surface runoff potential. The AEMP sampling design captured atrazine runoff events following chemical applications to corn and sorghum agriculture when residue levels in the receiving stream are expected to be at their maximum. The breadth of atrazine concentration data from water samples accompanied by watershed characteristics, meteorological data and agronomic data provide a comprehensive understanding of atrazine transport mechanism. The AEMP monitoring data quantifies the upper 20th centile of potential aquatic exposure to atrazine in corn and sorghum growing areas in the United States. The presentation will provide an overview of the site selection process, study design, sample and data collection process, and a summary of important findings.
Jennifer Trask, Les Carver, Megan Cox, Kate Marincic (Waterborne Environmental), Sun Mao Chen (Syngenta Crop Protection). Atrazine Ecological Monitoring Program: Study design and conduct. ACS 2018. Presentation. Boston, MA.
Crop ProtectionWater/Wastewater AssessmentPresentations
Interpreting water quality monitoring observations through modeling: PRZM/SWAT and SEAWAVE-Q
Room: Ballroom East – Theater 4
Date: Wednesday August 22, 2018
Start Time: 10:35AM
Presentation Code: AGRO 231
Water quality monitoring data, specifically pesticides, can represent best-available exposure profiles related to ecological risk assessment; however, there are challenges in synthesizing these data toward making strong conclusions about the nature of the potential range of risk. Some of these challenges include: data collection frequency, monitoring period duration, interpreting exposure profiles from one location to another, and monitoring system scale. To address these challenges, statistical approaches may be applied to characterize empirical trends. Additionally, process-based numerical systems modeling approaches can offer a different perspective on synthesis and interpretation of monitoring data. A comparison of a statistical and process-based numerical model was conducted to evaluate strengths and weaknesses of representing, synthesizing, and conclusions from monitoring data. This comparison was developed from pesticide measurements of six intensively-monitored HUC12 headwater watersheds in the Midwest. SEAWAVE-Q is a regression model that incorporates a linear trend term, covariates accounting for seasonality, and a transformation of flow to represent a long-term pesticide trend at a specific monitoring location. PRZM/SWAT (pesticide root zone model/soil water assessment tool) is a spatially-distributed hydrologic and chemical transport numerical model that combines upland chemical and hydrologic processes from PRZM and stream flow and chemical transport processes from SWAT. The predictive quality and limitations of these two models was assessed against observed, daily concentration measurements as well as hypothetical data collection frequency and timing (derived from sub-sampling the same data sets). Results suggest that a process-based modeling approach, such as PRZM/SWAT, may be more advantageous when calibration data are available.
Daniel Perkins, Andy Jacobson, Colleen Roy, Farah Abi-Akar (Waterborne Environmental), Wenlin Chen (Syngenta Crop Protection). Interpreting water quality monitoring observations through modeling: PRZM/SWAT and SEAWAVE-Q. ACS 2018. Presentation. Boston, MA.
Using geospatial techniques for effective product stewardship
The goal of this project was to identify agricultural soils reflected in the acetochlor label use restriction, which overlap with shallow ground water. Acetochlor-based products are labeled for use within the United States to control annual grasses and certain broadleaf weeds and can be applied preplant, at-planting, preemergence and/or postemergence to labeled crops. Acetochlor product labels restrict applications within 50 feet of any well where depth to ground water is ≤ 30 ft. The Acetochlor Registration Partnership (ARP – Dow AgroSciences and Monsanto Company) developed voluntary Best Management Practices (BMPs) for acetochlor to reduce the potential for the active substance and its major environmental metabolites in ground water and surface water, following application to agricultural fields. The ARP offers a website (www.arpinfo.com) with resources for end-users to help ensure the effective use and stewardship of products containing acetochlor. Depth to ground water information is often not readily available, which makes it challenging to depict the spatial distribution of areas where the use restriction should be observed. One can point to privacy concerns as a reason for the lack of ground water depth information available to the public. An assessment was conducted to identify crop lands with potential acetochlor use restrictions in Arizona, using geospatial techniques. Arizona’s Department of Water Resources provides historical ground water depth data for point locations via a public monitoring database (http://www.azwater.gov/azdwr/GIS/). Groundwater depth information was extracted from the monitoring database for the period 1995 to 2015. As a data handling procedure, outliers were removed, then cluster and hotspot analyses were performed. The final dataset contained over 12,000-point observations of ground water depth for a 20-year period. Long-term average depths were calculated for each location. To generate a state-wide average groundwater depth map, a spatial interpolation technique was applied to the GIS vector or point dataset. The final ground water map was overlaid with National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) Cropland Data Layer (CDL) data to identify agricultural soils with potential concerns. For cotton, the assessment showed that just 3% of the agricultural areas overlap with shallow ground water.
Amy M. Ritter (Waterborne Environmental), Cornelis Hoogeweg (Waterborne Environmental), Mark Anthony Thomas (Monsanto Company), Annette Kirk (Monsanto Company). Using geospatial techniques for effective product stewardship. ACS 2018. Poster. Boston, MA.
Assessing the environmental risk of pesticides, biopesticides, and anthelmintics used in managing vector-borne diseases
Insecticides, biopesticides, and parasitical agents are among the arsenal of tools used to control the transmission of vector-borne diseases. In the United States, these products are regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) or by the Food and Drug Administration under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). Chemical and biological releases to the environment can occur from a variety of mechanisms including aerial or ground applications of pesticides to the landscape, wash-off of ectoparasiticides or excretion of anthelmintics from livestock or pets, and down-the-drain discharges from washing treated clothing. Approaches to evaluating the different delivery mechanisms and their potential adverse impacts to non-target organisms are presented through case studies.
W. Martin Williams, Joshua Amos, Megan White Guevara, Amy M. Ritter. Assessing the environmental risk of pesticides, biopesticides, and anthelmintics used in managing vector-borne diseases. ACS 2018. Poster. Boston, MA.