Waterborne Search Waterborne Navigation

Publications: 2017

PresentationsCrop Protection2017

Using Web-Based Technologies to Inform Stakeholders – CoPST

View MoreView Less

Abstract:

Increasingly the Internet is a means to relay complex information to stakeholders. Underlying GIS-based technologies now allow organizations to serve up complex information is meaningful manners and provide additional information in an interactive environment. CoPST is an integrated GIS-modeling framework that incorporates 40 high-risk pesticides and 12 aquatic endangered species presence to identify areas and timing of greatest risk in the Sacramento and San Joaquin river watersheds of California.. The framework uses data from the California Pesticide Use and Reporting database in combination with PRZM, RICEWQ models to estimate pesticide loadings to surface water at the public land survey system section level. Results are combined with species distribution maps to determine co-occurrence. Results are depicted as a series of maps was generated for the study area. These maps include several pesticide heat maps that depict pesticide use intensity. Included are a Total heat map, an Agricultural heat map and pesticide specific heat maps. Tied in with this these maps are the option to retrieve relevant monitoring information for each pesticides of interest. Heat map series include temporal information that allows the users to stepwise walk through each month of the year to see which areas are potentially of concern.

Cornelis Hoogeweg (Waterborne Environmental),  Rich Breuer (California Water Control Board), Debra Denton (USEPA), W Williams (Waterborne Environmental). Using Web-Based Technologies to Inform Stakeholders – CoPST. Presentation ACS 2017. Washington DC.

PresentationsCrop Protection2017

Soil Sustainability: The Reality of Erosion Reduction Practices by Farmers and the Impact to Estimated Environmental Concentrations in a Risk Assessment

View MoreView Less

Abstract:

Since 1985, USDA National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has had joint responsibility to carry out the Highly Erodible Land (HEL) and Wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act that helps farmers by delivering technical and financial assistance for conservation. HEL is identified as a field that contains soils which have an erodibility index of ≥8. If a farmer has a field that is identified as HEL, they are required to maintain a system of conservation practices to substantially reduce erosion rates to long-term sustainable levels. If the conservation practices are not adequate to reduce erosion, the farmer may be ineligible for certain USDA payments. Conservation practices that are recommended include grassed waterways, grade stabilization structures, terraces, and tillage management. A field is considered to be sustainable if the soil erosion loss is less than 5 tons/acre per year (on average). However, some US EPA Tier II modeling scenarios used in regulatory screening assessments are parameterized for the PRZM model to have a 30-year average of greater than 30 tons/acre per year; a level which would not be sustainable for continued agricultural production. These Tier II PRZM scenarios do not reflect that growing crops as parameterized is not an option open to the grower expecting program payments. For pyrethroids, which are exceptionally hydrophobic; and therefore, almost exclusively bound to soil, modeling such unsustainable soil erosion leads to predictions of very high pyrethroid loads entering receiving water bodies. This presentation will explore the impact on the estimated water and sediment environmental concentrations for pyrethroids by adjusting input parameters in standard EPA model crop-specific scenarios to match USDA recommended practices for cultivating the crops concerned on HEL land.

Amy Ritter, Dean Desmarteau (Waterborne Environmental), Paul Hendley (Phasera Ltd). Soil Sustainability: The Reality of Erosion Reduction Practices by Farmers and the Impact to Estimated Environmental Concentrations in a Risk Assessment. Presentation ACS 2017. Washington DC.

PresentationsCrop Protection2017

Spatial Re-Allocation of Pesticide Use Data in Agricultural and Urban Settings

View MoreView Less

Abstract:

California’s Pesticide Use and Registration (PUR) database provides detailed information regarding application timing, rates, crops and location. The public version of the PUR provides location information at the public land survey system level (PLSS) for agricultural uses. A typical PLSS unit is roughly 1 x 1 mile or 640 acres. For urban uses, the PUR provides data at the county-level. Using land use information from diverse data sources such as the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD), California Farm Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), it is feasible to re-allocate PUR data for both agricultural and urban settings. Within a GIS, it can be determined which fraction of a PLSS unit is agricultural and which is urban. Urban information can further be refined in low, medium, high density and industrial. All these land use classes can be used to demine the more likely locations of pesticide applications. Because several of the datasets are updated frequently, potential use areas were also updated, thereby introducing a refined spatial-temporal component of pesticides applications across the landscape. This re-allocation process was implemented to assess the location and number of pesticide applications to support an assessment of co-occurrence of pesticides and endangered species in California’s Central Valley. Results shows that agricultural areas can be refined and that county-level use data can be distributed using a weighting schema across the county. This spatial re-allocation resulted in more realistic use patterns that were used in the assessment.

Cornelis Hoogeweg, Raghu Vamshi, W. Williams, Mark Cheplick (Waterborne Environmental). Spatial Re-Allocation of Pesticide Use Data in Agricultural and Urban Settings. Presentation ACS 2017. Washington DC.

PresentationsCrop Protection2017

Estimating Outdoor Residential and Urban Pesticide Use from the California Pesticide Use Reporting Database

View MoreView Less

Abstract:

Estimating outdoor use of pesticides in urban settings requires the consideration of factors that are not typically addressed in agricultural settings. Urban/residential pesticides are used in home gardens, landscape aesthetics, vector control, preservation of wooden structures, and otherwise to erradicate or deter pests in residential and urban premises. California is unique relative to other states in reporting requirements for pesticide applications. Howver, urban use records are not as precise as agricultural records that report the day of application and at a PublicLand Survey System (PLSS) spatial resolution. Urban applications are reported only by licensed Pest Corol Operators at much coarser monthly and county-level resolutions. Homeowner use is not contained in the PUR. A method for estimating non-agricultural outdoor applications of pesticides by professional and homeowners at a daily and PLSS resolution was developed using the county-level PUR database, homeowner sales data, land use records, statistics derived from surveys, and other available sources. The results have been used to predict potential pesticide runoff from urban and residential areas.

W. Williams, Cornelis Hoogeweg (Waterborne Environmental), Yuzhou Luo (California Dept of Pesticide Regulation), Kelly Moran (TDC Environmental). Estimating Outdoor Residential and Urban Pesticide Use from the California Pesticide Use Reporting Database. Presentation ACS 2017. Washington DC.

PresentationsCrop Protection2017

Tracer Studies in Headwater Watersheds in the Midwestern U.S. to Characterize Stream Flow Dynamics

View MoreView Less

Abstract:

Stream flow dynamics influences agrochemical exposure timing, duration, and frequency. Tracer studies were conducted in headwater watersheds in Iowa and Missouri to characterize stream hydrological properties to better understand drivers behind the magnitude and duration of crop protection chemical concentrations in stream water and watershed model parameterization. We used chemical tracer chemographs to calculate travel time and stream volume for stream reaches under low-flow conditions. Florescent dye was injected at strategic stream locations and continuously monitored with in-situ fluorometers. Accurate travel times of the chemical tracer were calculated from injection points to corresponding, downstream monitoring points along stream reaches, and were then combined with stream discharge data to estimate stream reach flow volume. Assessing tracer data with observed runoff events indicated that the ratio of rainfall-driven stream flow to initial stream flow volume influenced duration of chemical exposure at the headwater outlet. Results also illustrate that flow in small headwater streams is significantly different from that predicted by NHD+ indicating stream characteristics at this scale require higher resolution data. Finally, tracer study results are being used to inform stream flow numerical simulations toward a better representation of stream hydrodynamic properties at the headwater watershed scale.

Greg Goodwin, Daniel Perkins, Megan Cox, Les Carver, Jennifer Trask (Waterborne Environmental), Sun Mao Chen (Syngenta Crop Protection). Tracer Studies in Headwater Watersheds in the Midwestern U.S. to Characterize Stream Flow Dynamics. Presentation ACS 2017. Washington DC.

PresentationsCrop Protection2017

Field Study to Determine Runoff and Deposition of an Herbicide in Pasture Conditions

View MoreView Less

Abstract:

A field-scale runoff study was conducted to evaluate the fate of herbicide residues when applied under field conditions typical to pasture production. The study monitored movement from treated areas through runoff and possible deposition in untreated down gradient areas in Texas and North Carolina. The study included a novel two-part design: 1) a Small Scale Runoff study to verify model parameters following treatment to three different cover conditions and 2) a Large Scale Runoff study to determine the residue pattern and runoff from treated to untreated areas of typical pasture following a significant rainfall event. This study was conducted in accordance with EPA FIFRA Good Laboratory Practice Standards (GLP), 40 CFR 160. The presentation will focus on the complex study goals and novel field study implementation approach including sampling methods, simulated rainfall equipment and monitoring techniques. A general discussion of results including regional differences observed and variations in impact of residue profile based on cover conditions. Discussion of unique sampling methods related to quantifying grass, thatch and soil residues will be included. The complex study provided data for both quantifying movement in the pasture environment as well as parameters useful for environmental fate modeling under different cover conditions.

Les Carver, Jennifer Trask, Nathan Snyder (Waterborne Environmental), Cecilia Mucha Hirata, Aldos Barefoot ( DuPont Crop Protection). Field Study to Determine Runoff and Deposition of an Herbicide in Pasture Conditions. Presentation ACS 2017. Washington DC.

PresentationsCrop Protection2017

Vegetated Ditches as a Best Management Practice to Filter Pesticides, Sediment, and other Constituents from Agricultural and Urban Runoff Water

View MoreView Less

Abstract:

Vegetated ditches and bioswales have been promoted and incorporated into the agricultural and urban landscape to reduce the transport of pesticides, nutrients, sediment, and other water quality consitituents in runoff water. Research studies over the past 12 years have examined their utility as best management practices (BMPs) across a range of applications. These results are compiled and compared to predictions from the Vegetated Filter Ditch Model (VFDM) that was developed to design vegated agricultural drainage ditches at a farm level. At the time of development, very little data was available to evaluate the accuracy of model predictions. Now, approximately 10 years later, additional research has become available to verify the applicability of the model to evaluate the water quality benefits of vegetated ditches and swales in both agricultural and urban settings.

Marty Williams, Jennifer Trask (Waterborne Environmental), Debra Denton (EPA). Vegetated Ditches as a Best Management Practice to Filter Pesticides, Sediment, and other Constituents from Agricultural and Urban Runoff Water. Presentation ACS 2017. Washington DC.

PresentationsCrop Protection2017

Effect of the Formulation of Vegetative Filter Strips Pesticide Residue Degradation on Environmental Exposure Assessments

View MoreView Less

Abstract:
Understanding and being able to simulate the fate and transport of pesticides from the application on a field, through a vegetative filter strip (VFS), and finally to adjacent receiving water bodies is critical for conducting high-tier environmental exposure risk assessments (ERA). Previous research has proposed a modeling framework that links the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (US-EPA) PRZM/EXAMS with a well-tested process-based model for VFS (VFSMOD). This was recently updated to consider pesticide residue trapped in the VFS and degradation prior to subsequent rainfall/runoff events. However, there is disagreement among different ERA regulatory agencies on how different formulations incorporate modifications for temperature and soil water dynamics may affect pesticide loads and the final estimated environmental concentration (EECs) in the aquatic environment. The objective of this research was to update the current modeling approach to consider four formulations for VFS pesticide degradation to accommodate different regulatory environments, and to determine if residues in the VFS and/or aquatic EECs differed among formulations. The importance of the degradation formulations was evaluated for two model pesticides (mobile and rapidly degrading versus less mobile and persistent) for three distinct agroecological scenarios (continental row-crop agriculture, wet maritime extensive agriculture, and dry Mediterranean intensive horticulture) and for receiving water systems lacking VFS, and with VFS of lengths of 1 to 9 m. While the type of degradation equation was important in long-term assessments to predict VFS residues at the beginning of each storm event (statistically different at p<0.01), the degradation formulation was not found important relative to EECs estimation. These results are important since they indicate that the impact of considerations on pesticide residue degradation formulation on EECs estimated is negligible in what it refers to EECs modeled through a VFS. The approach can also inform the relative importance of field degradation processes.

Amy Ritter (Waterborne Environmental), Rafael Munoz-Carpena2, Garey Fox (North Carolina State University), Oscar Perez-Ovilla(Bayer CropScience), Ismael Rodea-Palomares (University of Florida). Effect of the Formulation of Vegetative Filter Strips Pesticide Residue Degradation on Environmental Exposure Assessments. Platform. ACS 2017. Washington DC.

PostersCrop Protection2017

Use of the OECD ENASGIPS Crosswalk Tool

View MoreView Less

One of the deliverables from the OECD Pesticide Dissipation Project is a GIS-based application to assess the similarity of ecoregions between Europe and North America. The objective of this tool is to find matching ecoregions which enable registrants to demonstrate that foreign test site conditions exist in either Europe or North America. This GIS application has the potential of being used in a variety of manners. Risk assessors can easily determine if e.g. the dissipation results from rice studies conducted in the US are applicable to European registration and vice versa. Although, the tool is easy to use, expert knowledge regarding the underlying data and model help with interpretation? the results. In this presentation, we will explore how the tool and the underlying data can be used to find locations with environmental conditions that match foreign test sites, and the implications of registration of pesticides in Europe from an ecoregion perspective. In addition, we will address issues such as crop data, discuss the implications of using long-term versus short term field data, and account for variability in climate and soil properties and the impact on site selection.

G.Hoogeweg, C.M. Holmes (Waterborne Environmental). Use of the OECD ENASGIPS Crosswalk Tool. SETAC Europe 2017. Poster.

PostersHome and Personal Care Products2017

A Framework for Dynamic Estimation of Aquatic Environmental Concentrations of Microplastics Via WWTP Discharge

View MoreView Less

Down-the-drain exposure models provide a valuable screening-level tool for estimating environmental exposure to substances which are treated and discharged at municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Microplastics enter WWTPs from a variety of sources. As such, exposure models traditionally used for chemicals may also be utilized for particle emissions into the environment from WWTP discharge. These models often account for removal in WWTP as well as in-river decay processes. However, in light of incomplete and changing knowledge on microplastic fate in surface waters, we developed a framework in which microplastic use rates and general properties can be used to estimate the range of expected environmental concentrations depending on assumptions about removal and decay. We developed a web-based tool incorporating 10 removal rates and 10 decay rates encompassing the typical and extreme ranges of possible values. Each of the 100 model runs produces a distribution of Predicted Environmental Concentration (PECs) representing each effluent impacted stream as described by the iSTREEM® model which estimates spatially-explicit concentrations of chemicals in effluent and receiving waters across the US. Output visualization in the interactive tool includes a broad view of all possible combinations in a matrix format, and a detailed view of the full distribution of PECs for individual model runs. Within the matrix, each of the 100 individual cells correspond to a selected percentile of the PEC distribution (e.g., 95th percentile) for tha combination of removal and decay. We demonstrate the utility of this framework using WWTP influent loadings of polyethylene microbeads from liquid soaps and shower gels estimated using per-capita usage (Gouin et al 2011) and combine with individual facility population served and flow estimates using the iSTREEM model. We can the investigate the question … What kind of environmental concentrations might we estimate using these emissions? This dynamic framework can be used to help inform environmental exposure assessments by readily providing PECs based on varying model inputs on WWTP removal and in-stream decay rates for microplastics, which continues to evolve as more research is conducted. While this framework was applied to the US at a national scale, the framework itself is not geographic-dependent and could function equally well utilizing PEC distributions from Europe or elsewhere.

C.M. Holmes, R. Vamshi, N.Maples-Reynolds (Waterborne Environmental); I.A. Davies, B. Jonas (Personal Care Products Council), S.D. Dyer (The Procter & Gamble
Company / Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability Organization). A Framework for Dynamic Estimation of Aquatic Environmental Concentrations of Microplastics Via WWTP Discharge. SETAC EU 2017. Poster.